"Social Darwinism emerged as a movement in the late 19th-century, and has had waves of popularity…"

“Social Darwinism emerged as a movement in the late 19th-century, and has had waves of popularity ever since, but its central ideas owe more to the thought of a luminary of that time, Herbert Spencer, whose writings are (to understate) no longer widely read. Spencer, who coined the phrase “survival of the fittest,” thought about natural selection on a grand scale. Conceiving selection in pre-Darwinian terms — as a ruthless process, “red in tooth and claw” — he viewed human culture and human societies as progressing through fierce competition. Provided that policymakers do not take foolish steps to protect the weak, those people and those human achievements that are fittest — most beautiful, noble, wise, creative, virtuous, and so forth — will succeed in a fierce competition, so that, over time, humanity and its accomplishments will continually improve. Late 19th-century dynastic capitalists, especially the American “robber barons,” found this vision profoundly congenial. Their contemporary successors like it for much the same reasons, just as some adolescents discover an inspiring reinforcement of their self-image in the writings of Ayn Rand .”

The Taint of ‘Social Darwinism’ – NYTimes.com

Breaking it down in this blog post, Columbia Philosophy professor Philip Kitcher explains simply what ‘Social Darwinism’ means and how it relates to the use of the term by President Obama in reference to the Ryan budget. In this example of great context and meaning for a short-hand term that will surely course through the punditsphere, the Times offers a thoughtful platform for consideration of how the real concept is regarded by the practitioners who employ it with meaning. 

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)